"bhtooefr" (bhtooefr)
09/20/2017 at 14:29 • Filed to: mazda, rotary, electric vehicles | 3
| 11 |
Apparently they’re !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! , as well as a range-extended EV.
Never mind that the technology that can barely bring a Wankel into compliance would be better used making boingers better...
Chariotoflove
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 14:35 |
|
And I love them for it.
McMike
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 14:38 |
|
I don’t know why they keep rejecting this idea. These engines powered all the great WW1 and a lot of the WW2 aircraft.
RamblinRover Luxury-Yacht
> McMike
09/20/2017 at 14:52 |
|
Hon hon hon hon hon.
-Gnome/Le-Rhone
My bird IS the word
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 15:07 |
|
Comes out with revolutionary skyactiv engine, immediately goes back to wankel
bhtooefr
> McMike
09/20/2017 at 15:11 |
|
Wait, rotaries in WW2?
Radials, yes, but rotaries?
McMike
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 15:17 |
|
Yeah, that’s what I meant.
mazda616
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 15:27 |
|
I love Mazda (we own two of them) but even I can admit it’s time to move on from the rotary.
bhtooefr
> McMike
09/20/2017 at 15:32 |
|
I figured you meant rotaries (as in radials, except the crankcase spins and the crankshaft is fixed), which were very much a thing in WW1, but were completely dead by WW2.
McMike
> bhtooefr
09/20/2017 at 15:43 |
|
I know what a rotary is.
:)
AkursedX
> McMike
09/20/2017 at 15:58 |
|
I’d drive that!
gmporschenut also a fan of hondas
> bhtooefr
09/21/2017 at 20:44 |
|
i wonder if given the very tiny size, and weight of a wankel if it would be a good match as an ev extender?